Loading nation profile
Systemic vulnerability profile
Methodology BandSets-v1 · 50 components across 5 layers · scored 2026-10-24 · 1 score change in 30 days
Confidence high · 45 of 50 components scored (5 n/a — no evidence in the graph) · 103 of 127 evidence items cited
Systemic Vulnerability Index
8 / 10
High vulnerability
Resources
7.7
raw 6.7 × 1.15 · high
10 of 10 components scored
Preservation
7.5
raw 7.1 × 1.05 · high
9 of 10 components scored · 1 n/a
Intelligence
8.2
raw 7.5 × 1.1 · high
9 of 10 components scored · 1 n/a
Identity
9
raw 7.9 × 1.15 · high
9 of 10 components scored · 1 n/a
Game
7.3
raw 6.6 × 1.1 · high
8 of 10 components scored · 2 n/a
50 scored components are held behind the Analyst plan.
Each carries its five sub-dimension scores (exposure, fragility, criticality, recovery, threat pressure), an analytical justification and its evidence references. The layer scores and the index above are open.
Resources
Scores are analytical estimates produced from open-source and graph evidence, not audited financial or security assessments. Interpretation is judgement, not measurement — verify against the underlying sources before acting on it. Methodology
What changed
Every score movement, with its cause. Positive = more systemically vulnerable. Written by the engine's ledger; nothing here is edited by hand.
SVI 8.08 → 7.95-0.13
Component-level movements and rationale are part of the Analyst tier. See plans →
Scenario — cascade simulation
What a shock to Myanmar would propagate to, through the relationship graph (ownership, control, dependence, supply, flows, location, alliances). A model of structure, not a forecast.
Cascade scenarios are part of the Analyst tier.
See plans →Disclaimer: this is a structural propagation model over the public relationship graph with analyst-set transmission coefficients per relationship type (decay 0.85 per hop). It is not a prediction, not a stress test, and not financial or security advice. Modelled SVI values are illustrative and never written to the ledger. Coverage is limited to relationships recorded in the graph; absence of an entity here means no recorded link, not no exposure.
6 Resources & energy metrics — values open with any Intel Map plan
Deposits, extraction, generation facilities
11 Economy — primary/secondary metrics — values open with any Intel Map plan
Sector dominance by region
1 Economy — tertiary metric — values open with any Intel Map plan
Services and high-value sectors
7 Financial infrastructure metrics — values open with any Intel Map plan
Exchanges, banks, corridors
Need deeper analysis on Myanmar?
Commission a full intelligence report or book a strategy call.
Preservation
Intelligence
Identity
Game
SVI 7.49 → 8.08+0.59
Component-level movements and rationale are part of the Analyst tier. See plans →
Answers are grounded only in Myanmar's scored data. Every figure used is cited with its source, date and confidence. Where the data cannot answer, it says so.
Standing briefings
Sign in to ask your own questions about Myanmar.